<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WOMEN FILM CRITICS CIRCLE AWARDS 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>First National Association Of Women Critics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:33:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gold high heel shoes</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>gold high heel shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>YAA Adding this to my bookmarks. Thank You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAA Adding this to my bookmarks. Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>No-one crys fake rape in Atonement- Lola really &lt;I&gt;was&lt;/I&gt; raped. I&#039;m a little confused. I&#039;m also confused as to how Hairspray can both win Best Female Images In A Movie while also being on the Hall of Shame- doesn&#039;t that contradict?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No-one crys fake rape in Atonement- Lola really <i>was</i> raped. I&#8217;m a little confused. I&#8217;m also confused as to how Hairspray can both win Best Female Images In A Movie while also being on the Hall of Shame- doesn&#8217;t that contradict?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bentley</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>bentley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>fems suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fems suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wfcc</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>wfcc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thank you for sharing your thoughts. It&#039;s been brought to our attention by readers, as well as some of our own members, that the category of Hall Of Shame requires some explanation. So we&#039;ve corrected that. Also, here are my own thoughts about films that are offensive to women, in an article with my own best and worst list of the year. Because of the dilemma of films that may indeed be well made but have objectionable content, I&#039;ve created three categories instead of two: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly:

The Year In Movies: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly

By Prairie Miller

It&#039;s not that I&#039;m someone who has a tough time making up my mind - which I am - but when it comes to figuring out the Top Ten and Bottom Ten Movies of the year, there are all sorts of annoying gray areas. So if you&#039;ve been mulling going into the field of movie criticism - which by the way doesn&#039;t require a license, but maybe should - beware the pitfalls, between those handfuls of popcorn.

Because there are so many reasons for liking or hating a movie. One big mental roadblock is being knocked out by the acting performances, but evaluating the story as a stinker. Like why blame the actors, just because the movie sucks. Would you heap insults on those fast food workers for dishing up your future coronary of super-sized fries?

So in order to best cover all bases, I&#039;m going to go with three categories, instead of two, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. The first two are self-explanatory. And the third category is reserved for movies that may have been impressively put together, but there&#039;s just something offensive about them, I dunno. I may also get really picky, and add a few boutique sub-categories. So here goes, in no particular order...

http://newsblaze.com/story/20071227065313tsop.nb/newsblaze/REVIEWS1/Movie-Reviews.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing your thoughts. It&#8217;s been brought to our attention by readers, as well as some of our own members, that the category of Hall Of Shame requires some explanation. So we&#8217;ve corrected that. Also, here are my own thoughts about films that are offensive to women, in an article with my own best and worst list of the year. Because of the dilemma of films that may indeed be well made but have objectionable content, I&#8217;ve created three categories instead of two: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly:</p>
<p>The Year In Movies: The Good, The Bad And The Ugly</p>
<p>By Prairie Miller</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m someone who has a tough time making up my mind &#8211; which I am &#8211; but when it comes to figuring out the Top Ten and Bottom Ten Movies of the year, there are all sorts of annoying gray areas. So if you&#8217;ve been mulling going into the field of movie criticism &#8211; which by the way doesn&#8217;t require a license, but maybe should &#8211; beware the pitfalls, between those handfuls of popcorn.</p>
<p>Because there are so many reasons for liking or hating a movie. One big mental roadblock is being knocked out by the acting performances, but evaluating the story as a stinker. Like why blame the actors, just because the movie sucks. Would you heap insults on those fast food workers for dishing up your future coronary of super-sized fries?</p>
<p>So in order to best cover all bases, I&#8217;m going to go with three categories, instead of two, The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. The first two are self-explanatory. And the third category is reserved for movies that may have been impressively put together, but there&#8217;s just something offensive about them, I dunno. I may also get really picky, and add a few boutique sub-categories. So here goes, in no particular order&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20071227065313tsop.nb/newsblaze/REVIEWS1/Movie-Reviews.html" rel="nofollow">http://newsblaze.com/story/20071227065313tsop.nb/newsblaze/REVIEWS1/Movie-Reviews.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Z.</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>you wrote &quot;It’s just a love story.&quot; not &quot;a pure love story.&quot; It’s maybe just a lust story.

good bye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you wrote &#8220;It’s just a love story.&#8221; not &#8220;a pure love story.&#8221; It’s maybe just a lust story.</p>
<p>good bye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>In fact, I am a Chinese as well and can&#039;t agree more with your point about Patriotism. However, I still don&#039;t think Patriotism or certain historical events are proper perspectives which should be over-emphasized in Zhang&#039;s story. Just like what I said in my previous message, the main idea of &quot;Lust Cautios&quot; isn&#039;t about Mr. Yee&#039;s notorious reputation or how he betrayed his country. It may be better for viewers to put their focus back to the emotional and sexual connections of men and women. You can see this point from the name of this story &quot; Lust, Caution.&quot; 

As your point about &quot;pure love story&quot;, I never say this is a pure love story. Love can be pure, at the same time, it can also has the lust part. It&#039;s human instinct. Right? Emotion and Sexual, Zhang might just wanna describe how sexual relationship influences a woman&#039;s perspective about a man. She once said,&quot; The way to a woman&#039;s heart is through her vagina. I guess this can explain why she put the word &quot;lust&quot; in the name of this story. 

Don&#039;t just see things through the historical points. After all, this film isn&#039;t all about the history. I really appreciate your points of view. They make me reflect on my perspectives about this movie. 

P.S. I am a woman. What&#039;s worng with that? btw, I also see movies of genres other than romance. Therefore, can&#039;t say that I am the kind of women who has &quot;special interest section in a video store.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I am a Chinese as well and can&#8217;t agree more with your point about Patriotism. However, I still don&#8217;t think Patriotism or certain historical events are proper perspectives which should be over-emphasized in Zhang&#8217;s story. Just like what I said in my previous message, the main idea of &#8220;Lust Cautios&#8221; isn&#8217;t about Mr. Yee&#8217;s notorious reputation or how he betrayed his country. It may be better for viewers to put their focus back to the emotional and sexual connections of men and women. You can see this point from the name of this story &#8221; Lust, Caution.&#8221; </p>
<p>As your point about &#8220;pure love story&#8221;, I never say this is a pure love story. Love can be pure, at the same time, it can also has the lust part. It&#8217;s human instinct. Right? Emotion and Sexual, Zhang might just wanna describe how sexual relationship influences a woman&#8217;s perspective about a man. She once said,&#8221; The way to a woman&#8217;s heart is through her vagina. I guess this can explain why she put the word &#8220;lust&#8221; in the name of this story. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just see things through the historical points. After all, this film isn&#8217;t all about the history. I really appreciate your points of view. They make me reflect on my perspectives about this movie. </p>
<p>P.S. I am a woman. What&#8217;s worng with that? btw, I also see movies of genres other than romance. Therefore, can&#8217;t say that I am the kind of women who has &#8220;special interest section in a video store.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Z.</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>To WFCC, I am a Chinese and fully support your decision on the lust.

To Fiona, first, let’s talk about the story. Is it just a love story? What kind of “love story” must be named “lust”? I believe you are a woman, and a woman on the special interest section in a video store. When “patriotism is just to relieve the conflicts in the distorted relationship between Wong Chia Chi and Mr. Yee” whom is a traitor of China in the film, it is no longer a simple love story. It is not very smart for a pure love story toying patriotism. Or, must it? Don’t you agree?

Her (Zhang Ailing, the author of the Original Fiction) romance was with a well known collaborator (aka HanJian in Chinese) of Japanese invasion of China, i.e., a traitor of China. Not surprisingly, Zhang Ailing, the lover of the traitor (Mr. Hu or Mr. Yee in the film) fled China after Japanese was defeated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To WFCC, I am a Chinese and fully support your decision on the lust.</p>
<p>To Fiona, first, let’s talk about the story. Is it just a love story? What kind of “love story” must be named “lust”? I believe you are a woman, and a woman on the special interest section in a video store. When “patriotism is just to relieve the conflicts in the distorted relationship between Wong Chia Chi and Mr. Yee” whom is a traitor of China in the film, it is no longer a simple love story. It is not very smart for a pure love story toying patriotism. Or, must it? Don’t you agree?</p>
<p>Her (Zhang Ailing, the author of the Original Fiction) romance was with a well known collaborator (aka HanJian in Chinese) of Japanese invasion of China, i.e., a traitor of China. Not surprisingly, Zhang Ailing, the lover of the traitor (Mr. Hu or Mr. Yee in the film) fled China after Japanese was defeated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lust Caution&quot; ? I am curious about the reason you put this film on the wall of shame. In that era, women in China were still under the domination of men. Even some of them went to college, still they weren&#039;t encouraged / allowed to participate in any social movements. In this story, from my point of view, these women could be seen as the forerunner of feminism in the oriental culture. Besides, Zhang Ailing (Author of the Original Fiction) took this story as the reflection of her own rommance. The main thesis is about relationship between man and woman at that historical time. Patriotism is just to relieve the conflicts in the distorted relationship between Wong Chia Chi and Mr. Yee. Whom she fell in love with? or why? shouldn&#039;t be evaluated trough the viewpoints of Feminism. &quot;Lust Caution&quot; isn&#039;t a film to preach Chauvinism, nor to oppress Women. It&#039;s just a love story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lust Caution&#8221; ? I am curious about the reason you put this film on the wall of shame. In that era, women in China were still under the domination of men. Even some of them went to college, still they weren&#8217;t encouraged / allowed to participate in any social movements. In this story, from my point of view, these women could be seen as the forerunner of feminism in the oriental culture. Besides, Zhang Ailing (Author of the Original Fiction) took this story as the reflection of her own rommance. The main thesis is about relationship between man and woman at that historical time. Patriotism is just to relieve the conflicts in the distorted relationship between Wong Chia Chi and Mr. Yee. Whom she fell in love with? or why? shouldn&#8217;t be evaluated trough the viewpoints of Feminism. &#8220;Lust Caution&#8221; isn&#8217;t a film to preach Chauvinism, nor to oppress Women. It&#8217;s just a love story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Golden Rock</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>The Golden Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest of the winners/losers here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest of the winners/losers here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pp</title>
		<link>http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>pp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfcc.wordpress.com/women-film-critic-circle-awards-2007/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&quot;Lust, Caution&quot;? You must kidding, what smart (American) feminists...you must think you know all women in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lust, Caution&#8221;? You must kidding, what smart (American) feminists&#8230;you must think you know all women in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
